Similar help and support threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
.NET Framework Installation Error Hi all, I just formatted my machine with Windows 7 64-bit then I got an error window while installing the latest .NET Framework 4.6.2 and I can successfully install 4.6.1 without problem. Please advise the workaround. Thanks! | Software | |||
.NET Framework 4.5 'Fatal Error During Installation' While trying to install Windows .NET Framework 4.5 from the standalone installer onto my laptop, I get the error message 'Fatal Error During Installation'. When installing with windows update, I get the error code (0x80070643). NB: The CBS.zip file was 38MB, far bigger than the maximum 8. As.. | Windows Updates & Activation | |||
.NET Framework Installation Error I royally screwed up. I tried to fix the CLR error 80004005 by uninstalling all .NET Framework versions my computer. After that, I restarted and tried to install the .NET Framework 4 on my computer. It downloaded the files, installed for maybe 1 minute and then says 'Installation failed' without.. | Installation & Setup | |||
.NET Framework 3.0 Installation error? http://i33.tinypic.com/15rgz5y.jpg Hmm, anyone know what it means by 'Windows features' ? | General Discussion | |||
Manual Installation of Framework 4.0 can not run Hello all, I have windows 7 64 bits and I have a problem with Framework 4.0. Windows suggested me with the updates it has downloaded correctly, but the installation crash. So I did a manual installation using this file 'dotNetFx40_Full_setup.exe' then he starts it decompresses a file on.. | General Discussion |
7 qc tools pdf in tamil. I'm currently using VS 2012 on a 64-bit PC, using Crystal Reports for VS 2012.
After installing Crystal Reports for VS 2012, I noticed there are 2 main folders:
The app that I'm going to deploy can be deployed on both 32-bit and 64-bit PCs, so which Crystal Reports DLLs should I reference? x86 or x64?
Or do I need to have 2 separate solutions, one with the x86 dlls referenced, and the other with x64?
Update:
What I did was to reference the x86 dlls when developing, and install the x86 redistributable version of crystal reports on all my deployment machines, regardless of its architecture. Hope that helps some of you guys out there
I know this isn't technically an answer to your question, but since it still remains unanswered even after having set a bounty, I thought I might suggest it anyway…
You might re-consider whether you really need a 64-bit version of your application. Most line-of-business applications (which I can assume is what you're building, since you're generating reports from it) do not really benefit from being 64-bit.
* New titles added every day! * More than 10 million titles spanning every genre imaginable. ISBN: B01A9EN6HK Size: 78559 KB File formats: ePub, PDF, Kindle, Audiobook Status: AVAILABLE Last checked: 28 Minutes ago! * Get the best Books, Magazines & Comics in every genre including Action, Adventure, Anime, Manga, Children & Family, Classics, Comedies, Reference, Manuals, Drama, Foreign, Horror, Music, Romance, Sci-Fi, Fantasy, Sports and many more. * Unlimited Books, Magazines, & Comics wherever you are.
You can build and distribute only a 32-bit version (x86) and it will still run on all machines, regardless of whether they are running a 32-bit or 64-bit version of Windows. This is because all 64-bit versions of Windows include a special subsystem (Windows-on-Windows, or WOW64) that runs 32-bit code. It's entirely seamless, and there are virtually no compatibility problems to speak of.
Lots of applications are deployed this way. Visual Studio itself is an excellent example: it's still 32-bit code, but runs fine even on 64-bit versions of Windows, thanks to WOW64.
So to do this, you just set your project to target x86 platforms, and reference 32-bit DLLs exclusively. Since you'll only be building a single binary, this would greatly simplify development and distribution efforts, not only in terms of figuring out which DLLs to reference, but also the amount of code you need to test and the distribution process itself.
If you write good code that follows standard idioms and recommended practices, adding 64-bit support later (if it ever does prove to be of some benefit for your case) would be a fairly trivial operation. The .NET Framework abstracts away platform-specific differences extremely well; that's how they can offer an 'Any CPU' targeting option.
Aside from that, if I am allowed to speculate (because I have no particular experience with Crystal Reports), I imagine that the public interface is identical for both the 32-bit and 64-bit DLLs.
In that case, you can just reference the 32-bit version for your development work, and then configure your build script to pick the correct version of the DLL depending on whether you're building a 32-bit or 64-bit binary.
Naturally, the installer would need to make the same choice, either during the install (if you're using a unified installer) or when you build the installer itself (if you have separate 32-bit and 64-bit installers).